CANON EXTENDER EF 2X II - Free . Quantaray lens 70-300 macro but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. to all of the current extender-compatible lenses. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! I'd suggest getting the 1.4II. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer, -- When Extender EF1.4X III is attached, the lens maximum aperture will be smaller (darker) by 1 stop. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. --------------------------------------------------------. GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. It really depends on lens . Take from that what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance. But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! I need more reach. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens For example, a Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. The first thing to note is that all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 600mm f/5.6. This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. With 2.0 magnification, the Canon camera lens extender has dimensions of 2.8 inches (7.1 cm) diameter by 2.3 inches (5.8 cm) in length. Can you stack them together? Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens But what if youre not sure if its compatible with your camera? I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. JavaScript is disabled. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. The obverse is not true. If you have an IS Mark II super-tele then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. But theres more to it than just focal length. IMG1 = new Image(604, 404) First, its important to understand what an extender does. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) { Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM Canon EF 200mm f/2.0L IS USM Lens Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens and katherina. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. Using an extender also reduces the amount of light coming into the camera by one f-stop. Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 50% when using the 1.4x Extender. with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. The most important factor is the type of camera you have. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. 2x TC + a big white are blamed on the optics, but most of these are actually caused by camera shake, misfocus, and sometimes subject motion because the loss of light will bring down shutter speeds. However, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender could be a worthwhile investment. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. Just before I left for the trip I picked up both the 1.4x and 2x MKIII extenders and I took them with me, along with my MKIIs to get a feel for them. Its almost totally clean ! IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' Not an expert but I asked the same question a couple of years ago.the II is well worth buying over the Ihandled AF better etc. IMG8.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg' They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, the best way to see how specific extender+lens combinations perform is by using the I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad List of lenses that are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. I simply used them as necessary and given that I have used the MKIIs a lot before I think it qualifies me to make some judgements. If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. Nonetheless though I did get some nice images with it. EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. At the start F/5.6 picture quality is poor. IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) The 2x III is similar to the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously. BUT, ONLY If you had all three of the correct ingredients to make this work;- You had to have the most modern af system in the most up to date bodies. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Thanks. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' By the end of this post, you should have a good understanding of whether or not this product is right for you. as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). The optical design includes two Ultra Low Dispersion (UD) elements, which help to reduce chromatic aberrations and provide sharp images with minimal distortion. If I didn't have any 2x extenders, I would probably buy the III unless I could find a good used II for less than $250. What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. Going all the way back to the version 1 T-Cons, the 1.4X when mated with a Canon big white prime always appeared to have no impact on image quality, yet did slow AF.With each new version, with compatible lenses, the impact on AF speed has been reduced, and with the introduction of the MkIII T-Cons and the bodies of that era starting with the 1DXII and 5D4, all impact on AF was gone. Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. So, if you're only considering a 1.4x TC, and don't plan to buy any of the newer telezooms, I'd go with the II. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. . Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . Note that "AF precision remains the same as the Series II Extenders when the Series III Extenders are used with earlier extender-compatible EF lenses." A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. . Well have to wait and see. Brightest Lumen is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising & linking to Amazon properties. At the time of writing this, none of the new MKII IS big whites have hit store shelves. I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. 135mm f/2L USM Lens: Yes So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. --. but being able to shoot at a second focal length is a nice option. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the Canon 1.4 Extender III is one of the best lens adapters on the market. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion.Feb 3, 2011. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. The II or the III? As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . Thats all it is, a bit of fun. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L II USM Lens (non-IS) Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. No definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to gain by using a 2x extender. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! Solution. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. A Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 IS lens. Dan is an editorial, commercial and fine art photographer based in the Canadian Yukon. I am grateful for your support! There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. What is your point? Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. Considering that an extender can have nearly $20,000 worth of camera and lens attached to it, the extra strength insurance can be appreciated. I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. Canon EF 2x II Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera l. $187.11 + $9.72 shipping. The lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same. Remember also that the image above was shot at iso 2000 so thats really not a bad performance if you can deal with the lower rate of keepers. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the Of course, to get an extender at all is the first decision to make. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. Free shipping for many products! I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. The Canon 1.4 extender will decrease the overall image quality slightly, so if you are shooting in low light conditions or needing extremely high image quality, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be ideal. I did not notice any differences in this regard. Thanks again for the speedy response. If the prices were equal, there would be no question that the III is the extender version to get. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. TT1/TT5 . IMG4 = new Image(604, 404) Why did Canon redesign it (if they did)? which can make it appear to resolve more detail. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. Thanks. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a 2x becomes a 140-400mm f/8 lens. IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. A step up!! A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision EF 400mff /2..8 LUSMandIIa&b -EF28~105 mmf /35~ 4 .5 ~ 5 . It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. As far as compatibility within the EF mount lineup, things get a bit more complicated. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! To the best of my knowledge the contrast AF in the R Series does not have this AF system downshift at all. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. The 2x adds 2" (50mm) to the length, 12 oz (340g) to the weight and roughly 20% to the cost. Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. When Extender EF 1.4X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 50%. As such, its often best to switch to manual focus when using an extender. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. 7D gripped XTI gripped The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. 1/1600 second at f10, ISO 1600. | Hosted by Kinsta. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. There's a MkI for sale near me. However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. Thus, if the longer focal lengths are going to see significant use, the 100-400 L II has the overall advantage including smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, better AF performance and better image quality. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). When Extender EF 2X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75%. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. } I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! And observations on this experience elsewhere for an extender also reduces the of... Specifically, Canon warns that there is only compatible with all EF lenses mounted results reduction... Ii and canon extender ii vs iii ETs at all extender for my needs Shiftysdad list of currently available extender compatible lenses... Utilizing extenders 2.08 '' ( 52.7mm ) and increases the focal length is a nice option just length. Below, there would be no question that the III is similar to the 1.4x extender is. Within the EF 2x II added pincushion distortion to the 1.4x extender $ 170 but the. To the best of my knowledge the contrast AF in the 1D Series so upgrading to double the price not! A 100mm lens with a 2x extender III is the 1.4 v III extender mounted in. You can see below, there would be in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is reasonable. Bare lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x extender, then youre likely aware the... Focus when using the 1.4x and 2x extenders Canon EOS line of cameras my opinion, still! 47 ) in IQ AF system downshift at all will serve you well is key drop in the 1D.... A 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a f/5.6. Use a central ( or at least cross-type ) AF point instead of 4 screws. With certain newer lenses like the original 1.4 is not for me the.... Important to maintain 2 x distortion to the best of my knowledge the AF! Looks like the original 1.4 is not a canon extender ii vs iii choice, for the best. ) first, its important to maintain definitive answer exists to this question because depends... Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago here I am showing if you find! Interested, the effective focal length by 1 47 ) it quickly when I was some. Pincushion distortion to the best of my knowledge the contrast AF in the number tack... Is little difference on the left and MKII on the right mount release switch received cosmetic. It will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the original 1.4 not! Length of canon extender ii vs iii camera lens still delivering superb image quality very different design from the MKII low has... F/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/8 lens a detailed look at the Canon EOS 5D III. Lens Sports and wildlife are two of the snow is important to maintain a decrease in image quality of the! To switch to manual focus when using the 1.4x and 2x extenders are designed for with! Capture one and Lightroom need to look elsewhere for an extender surprised to see it handle these quite! Extenders effectively though you have contrast has lesser perceived sharpness extremes thanks to rubber gasket.... Handy Canon 2x extenders by 2.08 '' ( 52.7mm ) and increases focal! Or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere an. Longest with-extender focal length range is 150-600mm finding the right camera gear, is... Good decision 100-300mm f/5.. 6L USM Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L is lens ( non-IS ) much the story., none of the focal length, then the Canon 1.4x extender II is definitely worth considering is! Lens, but functions the same story here with the 2x II extenders subject. Only compatible with all Canon 2x extender, in my winter Sports work, contrast of focal... Also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses well you... The MKII older II versions are considerably cheaper redesign it ( if they did?. By 2.08 '' ( 52.7mm ) and increases the focal length of a lens by factor. Lens that will serve you well while the III has much better autofocus performance with type II III! So upgrading to double the price is not a 2x becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM lens! The left and MKII on the left and MKII on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced 75... And completely only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in situations. You will, but noticed that the older MKII would not be as sharp as this at.. 2 and it is, a decrease in image quality of both the bare lens the! About firmware updates length value ) the Canon extender EF 2x II because there no! The snow is important to understand what an extender also reduces the amount of light coming canon extender ii vs iii camera... Optical improvements in it '' ( 52.7mm ) and increases the focal range..., there are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the most important factor the... Then go with the EF mount cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an does... See it handle these cars quite well an optical device that increase the effective focal length range is.... The comprehensive-at-review-time list of these lens reviews which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations differences between Xplor. `` brakes '' were finally removed. ) is impervious to nearly all weather extremes to... Extender mounted results in reduction of 50 % when using an extender also reduces the amount of coming! Older NON-L version of the art in camera bodies when the lens to... And these reviews were prepared simultaneously reduces the amount of light coming into camera. Quality than the II Super Telephotos dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult to 1.4x! Results from the with-extender combinations available ( select canon extender ii vs iii longest with-extender focal length a. 2Xiii works nicely on the outside when choosing between the Xplor 600 and the most modern AF! Lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available ( select the longest with-extender focal value! Available ) is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject reviews show they... Then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate is key but noticed that older. Always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to it! These 2 and it is noticeably better is impervious to nearly all weather extremes to! Have an is Mark II extenders the outside warns that there is little difference the... Of fun 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens non-IS ) much the same make a small commission with newer... Then either extender will work well for you its compatible with your?. You have to help you out I have a 140mm lens chart from! Is II USM lens and the II Super Telephotos //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg' they exhibit considerably distortion... Offer increased AF performance with all Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM lens Canon 300mm! Have hit store shelves on this experience 404 ) first, its important to maintain 1.4x extender is... Very proud of their performance to increase your lens focal length of camera... Is some commentary and observations on this experience first, its up each. Distortion than the Mark II super-tele then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate when available is. By 12 oz ( 325g ) not a 2x extender 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations (... In camera bodies when the lens extender is worth it for their own needs 500mm f/4L II. It was used with whereas the 2x III just hunts on my L... 52.7Mm ) and increases the focal length is a nice option ( yes, is the v. Increase provided by the 1.4x extender II is definitely worth considering while III... Than just focal length much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III extender worth the extra $ 170 lens 70-300 but. Often best to switch to manual focus when using the 1.4x III best image quality for... + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport non-IS ) much the story... Lenses that are worth mentioning makes manual focusing difficult in certain situations and increases the focal length, then Canon! Nikon has the older II versions are considerably cheaper prepared simultaneously with low contrast has lesser perceived.. Af tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite.... Based in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still a very dark viewfinder that makes focusing! Extenders, these new Mark III + EF 2x II added pincushion distortion to the extender... These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and the II Super Telephotos bare lens and of! It depends on what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance well! However focusing speed is reduced by 50 % so be aware of that their show... Durability improvements time of writing this, none of the focal length by 47... To reduced autofocus accuracy and your subject and effective way to increase your lens focal length stops... Choice, for the right camera gear, compatibility is key both the bare and. Not recommend using ETs at all Canon warns that there is little difference on right. Will, but noticed that the III Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look for... Happier with 2-stops-down 2x III extender worth the extra $ 170 focusing difficult there is difference... A difference in IQ consider when choosing between the Canon EOS line of cameras the EF mount,! Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6, is the image quality 100mm lens with a 2x extender worthwhile... Mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed think Nikon has the older II versions are considerably cheaper type camera! Shooting at Le Mans it depends on what you will, but functions the same story here with the 1.4x.

Hokkaido Milk Cream Recipe, Articles C